Based on feedback from the previous passive sensor integration pass, specifically regarding the towed array, work has been continued on expanding options for remotely deployed sensor platforms.
Primarially, this feedback has lead to investigation of utilisation of multiple drones to give similar extension of triangulation receiver base on wider bearings. The benefit of this system over the towed array is that, by deploying multiple drones, the vessel will be able to get much better passive sensor data, accelerating TMA and giving a tactical advantage.
However, the downside is not only an increase in the overall size of the drone body compared to a towed array (taking into account the need for fuel, guidance, and communications not on the towed array) is large, so only a limited number can be carried, with limited endurance and performance. Ie. As they will need to power and manoeuvrer themselves, the drones will not be able to be deployed indefinitely and, without direct access to the fusion plant’s output, nor will they be able to keep up with the vessel’s acceleration.
From a tactical perspective also, it is likely the drones will need to utilise a similar drive system to the vessel, albeit smaller and less capable. As such, each drone will likely increase the overall energy emissions of the vessel during manoeuvring with a drone formation deployed, thus making the whole system more susceptible to detection on passive sensors. Additionally, due to the use of similar drive technology, while the drones are set up to give full-sphere passive coverage though, like the vessel, they will suffer sensor degradation aft due to drive wash if accelerating, decelerating, or transiting to station.
There are, however, some options to mitigate, if not eradicate, the downsides of a drone arrangement:
Drone control is via narrow-beam laser link to minimise emissions and also reduce the chances of interception, though a backup radio antenna is also provided for emergencies should the laser system become inoperable. This laser system is also utilised for torpedo fire-control. While this does offer redundancy in the system, frees up hull space, and allows a broader arc across which each torpedo may be linked to the vessel’s fire-control, deployment of a drone formation may also limit the links available for this fire-control, thus limiting the number of salvos able to be stacked in that scenario.
And speaking of torpedoes…
As it is currently envisaged that the narrow-beam, this is perhaps as good of a time as any to start putting forward the preliminary torpedo design. Currently, each attack torpedo is made up of three components which are, for the most part, assembled in the magazine prior in response to the warfare officer’s input torpedo queue for each tube, prior to final inspection by the torpedo room crew and loading. These components are:
The Guidance Package is self-explanatory, containing rudimentary active and passive sensors should fire control need to be handed off to local guidance from the vessel’s sensors. Integrated into it are arms which carry control runs around the war load and back to the drive unit. It also incorporates a hollow centre for the war load probe extension.
The warload is the actual offensive component. Currently intended for use as the primary torpedo war load is a superdense kinetic impactor, possibly carrying an integrated or separate penetrator. However, provision has been made for other possibilities should they be required. These might include:
The drive unit is again self-explanatory, containing RCS able to orient the torpedo for vector changes utilising the main drive. The drive unit also houses the fire-control links at its aft.
This component also forms the basis for the torpedo system’s use for the deployment of scientific probes, entailing replacement of the guidance package and war load with a scientific sensor suite and modified guidance system. These would likely be kept separate to the magazine, possibly racked in the torpedo room itself, and manually assembled by the torpedo room crew onto the drive unit prior to launch.
Aside from general broad-spectrum probes, it may be possible to keep a number of empty probe bodies for the science team to outfit with more specialised equipment if required.
It is anticipated that magazines will have capacity for 50no. Torpedoes per tube, a “torpedo” in this case being the guidance package, drive unit, and standard kinetic impactor war load (stored separately in the magazine). Other war load types would be fewer in number and also stored in the magazine for integration in place of the impactor if required.
The vessel uses magnetoplasma (MIE) drives for main propulsion - that would be definite overkill for drones. But you could get a good mix of fuel compatibility and power/weight ratio with a hydrogen-powered arcjet. The stuff they're using in commercial satellites right now isn't up to much but we've had some (accidental) luck creating powerful arcs by overloading QCD superconductors.
A small hydrogen tank will last you ages so your main contraint will be electrical (battery) power - induction charging while docked should do the trick.
You'll only get about 100KW out of a hyrdogen arcject but that should be enough for station-keeping style manuevering.